The personal is the political
There’s a contingency in the American political scene—usually more vocal when their guy’s in hot water—who say that a man’s personal life has nothing to do with his governing abilities. I think that’s demonstrably quite false and utterly ridiculous. After all, if he can’t control himself whatever makes us think he can control a state?
Now-ex-New York Governor Elliot Spitzer is the latest victim to this movement. After a long career spent moralizing over the evils of adultery, poor ole Spitfire has found himself at the center of a scandal involving not only extramarital affairs, but incredibly high-priced extramarital affairs on the people of New York, seeing as they pay his salary and all.
Spitzer has now resigned, as well he should. He’s a public figure, and whether he likes that or not he’s called to a higher standard than, say, laymen who blog for a living. Spitzer can’t be trusted to keep a promise to his family, so how can we now expect him to lead a state?
It was right of Spitzer to resign from his office. He has lost his credibility and can no longer lead as effectively as he could before. Besides, it will give New York its first black legally blind governor. Does it get any better for the affirmative action crowd than that?